House Sitting During a Home Renovation: What's Actually Fair

Home > Blog > House Sitting During a Renovation

A listing mentions "some work happening in the garden." A sitter arrives to find tradesmen on site eight hours a day, active landscaping, real noise, real disruption, none of it properly disclosed beforehand. This is a pattern we've noticed come up repeatedly, and our stance on it is direct: this is not something a sitter should be expected to just put up with.

We are on a six-month TrustedHouseSitters sit ourselves right now, and while we haven't personally dealt with active renovation during a sit, this is something we've noticed discussed often enough among other sitters to be worth writing about properly. If you're new to the platform, a 25% discount on membership is available here.

The Pattern We've Noticed

This comes up regularly enough to be a recognisable situation rather than a one-off. A listing mentions something vague, minor garden work, a small project, and the reality on arrival is significantly more disruptive: full landscaping, renovation work, or construction either inside the home or immediately next door, with tradesmen present for hours at a stretch throughout the day.

The version of this that stands out most clearly to us: garden tidying mentioned in a listing, and active landscaping running eight hours a day once the sitter actually arrived. That gap between what's written and what's real is exactly the problem. It's the kind of thing that should be caught and flagged before a sitter ever commits, and when it isn't, the sitter is the one left absorbing the consequences of information the homeowner had and chose not to share properly.

Why This Matters More Than It Might Sound

If you're accepting a sit expecting to relax, work on your own projects, or simply enjoy a change of scenery, and instead you're dealing with tradesmen walking through the house and garden for a large part of every day, that's a fundamentally different experience than what was agreed to. This isn't a minor inconvenience to quietly absorb. It changes what the sit actually is.

Our honest view: if a homeowner is leaving specifically to avoid managing their pet during renovation work, and using a sitter to absorb that disruption instead, without disclosing it properly beforehand, that's a genuine misuse of the platform. It's not a fair exchange, it's offloading a difficult period onto someone who had no way to make an informed decision about it. A homeowner doing this deliberately, knowing the disruption was coming and not mentioning it, shouldn't be listing on these platforms at all.

What Actually Makes This Fair or Unfair

We should be clear about something we've glossed over so far: the renovation itself isn't automatically the problem. If a listing says plainly that there will be a couple of hours of work happening here and there during the sit, and you read that, decide you're fine with it, and accept the sit anyway, that's not unfair at all. It's an informed decision, and it's entirely up to you whether that trade-off works for your plans. Plenty of sitters would happily accept a bit of daytime noise in exchange for an otherwise great sit.

What makes it unfair is the gap between what you were told and what you actually find. If you agreed to something specific and vague, and arrive to something far more disruptive than what was described, that's not a disagreement about noise tolerance anymore, it's a homeowner stepping outside the agreement you both made. That's the actual line, not whether renovation happened, but whether you had the information you needed to say yes or no to it honestly.

This is also why we genuinely dislike vague listings, the kind that hint something might come up without ever giving real detail. We think this is often deliberate. A homeowner who's upfront about a disruptive renovation knows fewer people will apply, and a homeowner who stays vague gets more applicants, but often lower-quality ones, people who wouldn't have accepted with full information and are far more likely to leave early once they find out what they've actually walked into.

That outcome, a sitter arriving, discovering the reality, and leaving partway through, causes far more stress and disruption for everyone than a clear, honest listing would have in the first place. Vagueness isn't a neutral choice. It's a strategy, and it tends to backfire on the homeowner as much as it does on the sitter.

If a property is genuinely not liveable during a renovation, that's worth being honest about too, sometimes the answer isn't finding a sitter who'll tolerate it, it's hiring a paid property manager, or simply not travelling during that window.

It is not automatically someone else's responsibility to take on a difficult living situation for free just because a trip was already planned. If real help is needed to get through a disruptive period, that help deserves genuine compensation, not an exchange dressed up as house sitting when it's really asking for something closer to a job. Everyone involved deserves to know exactly what they're agreeing to, and to be able to make that decision with full information rather than finding out the hard way.

Our Own Closest Experience, and Why It's Different

We don't want to overstate our own experience here, since it's genuinely not the same situation. At our current sit in Portugal, we're high up with an unobstructed view, and in the distance there's a factory and a restaurant. Some music drifts up in the evenings, pleasant, actually, and it stops around 10pm. The factory runs occasionally, maybe two hours every few days at most. It's not something we'd call a problem, and it doesn't detract from the sit at all.

That's a genuinely different category from the pattern described above: distant, occasional, low-level ambient noise versus active construction happening on or immediately around the property for a large part of every day. The difference isn't subtle, and it's worth being honest about which one you're actually dealing with before deciding how seriously to take it.

It's worth being honest about where our own tolerance would actually end too. If that factory ran eight hours a day, every day, and the restaurant's music carried on for the same stretch, we wouldn't be nearly as relaxed about it. We'd raise it, and we'd likely be considering leaving rather than staying for the full six months. The occasional, low-level version we're actually living with is genuinely fine. The constant, all-day version isn't, and we don't think it's necessary to pretend otherwise just because our own situation happens to be the easier one.

What to Actually Do If This Happens to You

If you arrive to find undisclosed construction or renovation work significantly beyond what the listing described, this fits squarely into what we'd consider listing misrepresentation. Document it, note the hours, the type of work, how disruptive it genuinely is, and message the homeowner directly and factually rather than emotionally and platform.

If it's manageable and you're genuinely fine with it, staying is a completely legitimate choice. If it's not, the responsibility falls on the homeowner to sort out an alternative, arranging a replacement sitter or returning early, not on you to simply endure it because you've already arrived.

Contact the platform as well, even if you decide to stay, since a pattern of undisclosed disruption is exactly the kind of thing platforms need reported to catch repeat offenders. Our guide on what to ask a homeowner before you house sit is worth reviewing before your next application too, specifically asking about any planned work on the property or next door is a simple, direct question that can surface this before you ever commit.

Conclusion

Renovation happening during a sit isn't automatically unfair, disclosed properly, it's simply information a sitter can weigh and decide on for themselves. What's unfair is the gap between a vague listing and a disruptive reality, and a sitter left to discover that gap only after arriving. If a homeowner needs to leave during a renovation, that's understandable, and being upfront about it is all it takes to make the arrangement fair. Using an uninformed sitter to quietly absorb the fallout instead is not.

Caro and I have completed 20 house sits across 12 countries, driven 19,000km across Europe in our 1998 VW T4, and saved over $26,500 in accommodation costs over three years of house sitting. If you've dealt with undisclosed renovation or construction during a sit, tell us how you handled it in the comments, or DM us @housesittersguide, we answer everyone.

Frequently Asked Questions

• What should I do if a house sit turns out to involve active renovation not mentioned in the listing?

  Document the disruption, contact the homeowner directly and factually, and decide whether to stay based on how genuinely disruptive it is. If it's more than you're comfortable with, the homeowner is responsible for arranging an alternative, not you. Report it to the platform regardless of your decision.

• Is undisclosed construction during a house sit considered listing misrepresentation?

  Yes, if it's significant enough that knowing about it beforehand would have changed your decision to accept the sit, it fits the same standard covered in our guide on listing misrepresentation more broadly.

• Should I ask about renovation or construction before accepting a sit?

  Yes. Asking directly whether any work is planned on the property or immediately next door during your stay is a simple question that can surface this issue before you ever commit, and it's worth adding to your standard pre-sit questions.

• Is all background noise during a house sit a red flag?

  No. Distant, occasional, or low-level noise, traffic, neighbours, nearby businesses, is a normal part of most locations and shouldn't automatically be treated as a problem. The concern is specifically undisclosed, significant, ongoing disruption like active construction that wasn't mentioned in the listing.

• What if I'm fine with the noise and want to stay anyway?

  That's a completely legitimate choice. Reporting the discrepancy to the platform is still worth doing even if you decide to stay, since it helps flag a pattern if the same homeowner does this to future sitters.

Related Guides