What Happens to House Sitting in a Recession? (2026)

Home > Blog > What Happens to House Sitting in a Recession?

I want to be direct about what this article is. It's my opinion about what a recession would actually do to house sitting, based on three years doing this across 20 sits and 12 countries with TrustedHouseSitters, running housesittersguide.com, and watching both the platform community and the broader economic data closely. My prediction: a recession grows house sitting on both sides, more homeowners looking for free pet care as paid boarding costs rise, more sitters joining out of both lifestyle interest and genuine necessity. But it doesn't make house sitting easier to access. It makes it more competitive, as the best sits go to the strongest profiles in a larger, more crowded field.

The economic data is real and sourced. The analysis is mine. If you're thinking about building a profile before that competition intensifies, our 25% discount on TrustedHouseSitters is worth grabbing now rather than later.

The Current Recession Picture

As of mid-2026, the honest answer is that economists genuinely disagree. Estimates of US recession probability within the next 12 months range from around 15% up to 49%, depending on which forecaster you ask, with Moody's chief economist Mark Zandi among the more pessimistic voices, and market-based prediction platforms pricing the odds notably lower. The risk factors driving the disagreement: a potential pullback in AI-related spending, oil price volatility, and a softening labor market with unemployment forecast to climb toward 4.6%.

One detail from the current data matters more than the headline recession odds: economists increasingly describe a "bifurcated economy," where wealthier households keep spending, including on travel, while lower-income households face real, intensifying pressure. That split is exactly the dynamic I think shapes what happens to house sitting specifically, not a uniform boom or bust, but growth on multiple fronts at once, from different kinds of people for different reasons.

The 2008 Precedent: Airbnb Was Born From a Recession

The strongest historical evidence here isn't about house sitting directly, it's about Airbnb, and it's worth taking seriously as a precedent.

Airbnb launched in 2007 and scaled through 2008, in the middle of the Great Recession, founded specifically by two cash-strapped designers renting air mattresses in their own apartment to travelers who couldn't afford, or couldn't find, a hotel room. The company's entire early growth was fueled by two recession-driven forces at once: homeowners looking to monetize spare space because money was tight, and travelers looking for genuinely cheaper alternatives to hotels because money was tight for them too. Multiple retrospective analyses point to the same pattern in downturns generally: high-end, luxury travel contracts the hardest, while demand shifts into mid-range and budget accommodation rather than disappearing outright.

Travel spending drops in aggregate, but it very rarely goes to zero, some analysts specifically expect increased Airbnb host supply during a future downturn, as more people list a home or spare room they'd never previously considered renting out.

House sitting sits even further along that spectrum than Airbnb, since accommodation itself is completely free rather than merely cheap. If Airbnb's founding moment shows that a recession can create an entirely new budget-travel category from scratch, it's a reasonable prediction that an already-existing free-accommodation category grows meaningfully when the same financial pressure hits.

My Prediction: Growth on Both Sides, Not a Simple Boom

Here's where I differ slightly from a straightforward "recession equals house sitting boom" take, because I don't think it's that simple, and my own recent experience travelling through Europe backs this up.

When fuel prices spiked and cost-of-living anxiety was genuinely in the news, I expected to see fewer people travelling. I didn't. If anything, I was struck by how many people were still out there, still taking trips, seemingly unbothered.

I have friends in Australia, a household with two kids, who describe their day-to-day finances as genuinely tight, and yet they always seem to find money for a short trip. My honest read: for a lot of people, travel functions less like a luxury they cut first and more like something close to a non-negotiable, on par with other things people protect in their budget even under real pressure.

That changes the shape of my prediction. I don't think a recession primarily shrinks the number of people who want to travel. I think it shrinks how much they're willing to pay for the accommodation part of that travel, and pushes more of them toward options like house sitting instead of a hotel or paid pet boarding.

On the homeowner side, I'd actually expect a recession to pull in more luxury properties, not fewer, since rising costs for professional pet boarding and paid pet sitters would make the free exchange model relatively more attractive even to homeowners who'd never previously considered it. Our guide to luxury house sitting already shows that the appetite for high-end sits exists; I'd expect that pool to grow, not shrink, in a downturn.

The Other Side of Growth: More Competition, Not Easier Access

Here's the part of this prediction that matters most if you're already sitting, or thinking about starting: more listings does not mean easier sits.

I'm already blown away by how many people are house sitting full-time, jumping from sit to sit as a genuine lifestyle rather than an occasional travel hack, the way Caro and I do. For a growing number of people, it's becoming less of a lifestyle choice and more of a financial necessity. I expect a recession to accelerate that shift specifically: more people joining the lower-cost platforms in particular, seeking free accommodation because they genuinely need it, not just because they like the lifestyle.

That's the swing factor. If both the supply of listings and the number of applicants grow at once, the practical effect for any individual sitter is more competition for the best sits, not more available choice. My estimate is somewhere around 15,000 to 17,000 total listings across all major platforms worldwide today.

I'd expect that number to climb meaningfully in a downturn, but the sitters with the strongest profiles and the most established review histories will be the ones who actually benefit from that growth. Homeowners will have more applicants to choose from, and will increasingly need to work harder to attract genuinely strong sitters, particularly for the best properties. Our guide to why homeowners aren't getting applications already covers part of this dynamic, and I'd expect it to matter even more as the applicant pool grows.

What This Means If You're Starting Now

If a recession genuinely increases both listing volume and sitter competition, the sitters best positioned to benefit are the ones who build a strong profile and review history now, before that competition intensifies.

Our guide to getting your first sit without prior experience covers exactly how to do that from zero. If you're specifically thinking about this as a genuine financial strategy rather than an occasional travel hack, our guide to saving $10,000 a year combining house sitting and remote work covers the fuller economics. And if the appeal is really about escaping rising accommodation costs generally, our guide to house sitting fees across every platform is worth reading before you commit to any single platform.

For homeowners, the practical implication is the opposite: expect more applicants, and expect the strongest ones to have real leverage in choosing which listings they apply to. Our guide to finding reliable house sitters covers how to actually stand out and attract the sitters worth having, rather than just the highest volume of applications.

The Bottom Line

I don't think a recession is a simple win or loss for house sitting. I think it grows the market on both sides at once, more homeowners looking for a free alternative to rising paid pet care costs, including more luxury properties than exist today, and more sitters joining, some for the lifestyle, increasingly more out of genuine necessity. The net effect isn't that house sitting becomes easier to access. It's that it becomes a larger, more competitive market where a strong profile and an established review history matter more than ever. If you're already building toward this lifestyle, my honest advice is to build the record now, while the field is still less crowded than I expect it to become.

What's your own read on this? Do you think a downturn grows house sitting or shrinks it? I'd genuinely like to hear other perspectives, drop yours in the comments below.

Caro and I have completed 20 house sits across 12 countries, driven 19,000km across Europe in our 1998 VW T4, and saved over $26,500 in accommodation costs over three years of house sitting through TrustedHouseSitters. DM us @housesittersguide if you have questions, we answer everyone.

Frequently Asked Questions

• Will house sitting grow or shrink during a recession?

  My prediction is growth on both sides: more homeowners seeking a free alternative to rising paid pet care and boarding costs, and more sitters joining, both for lifestyle reasons and out of genuine financial necessity. The market gets larger, but also more competitive.

• What happened to similar sharing-economy platforms during past recessions?

  Airbnb was founded during the 2008 recession specifically because cash-strapped travelers wanted cheaper alternatives to hotels and cash-strapped homeowners wanted to monetize spare space. Historical data shows luxury travel contracts hardest in downturns, while demand shifts toward mid-range and budget options rather than disappearing.

• Will a recession make it harder to get a good house sit?

  Likely yes, in relative terms. More total listings doesn't mean easier access if the number of applicants grows just as fast or faster. Sitters with strong, established profiles and review histories are best positioned to benefit from a larger market; newer sitters may face tougher competition.

• Do homeowners actually cut back on travel during a recession?

  Not as much as you might expect, based on both the current economic data and personal observation. Travel spending in aggregate tends to shift toward cheaper options rather than disappear. Many people continue to prioritize travel even under real financial pressure.

Related Guides